HOME | ABOUT US | RESEARCH | CONSULTING | MEMBERSHIP | LINKS | CONTACT US


- About Tyho-Galileo
Introducing Tyho-Galileo
Mission Statement
Affiliation
Team
Goals
Galileo Galilei

Member Center
Login
Supporting Centers

Research
Clinical Trials
Ongoing Projects
Staff Profiles
Patents
Consulting Services
 
Patient Information
FAQ's
Cells Chromosomes
Cryopreservation
Gene Expression
Patient Benefits
RNA Interference
Vitrification
PGD
Membership
Benefits
Application
Services
Research
Recent Articles
Links
Journal Article Search
Contact Us
Personal Opinions On Oocyte Cryopreservation
By JAMES J. STACHECKI, Ph.D.  Galileo Staff Member

This article contains a few of opinions on the state of oocyte cryopreservation, as I see it.  It seems like every embryo and oocyte cryopreservation paper that has come out in the past 20 years is the same as the one before.  Two principles of cryopreservation (there are of course many more), namely intracellular ice formation (IIF) and osmotic effects (OE) have shown up in, dare I say, every paper on egg and embryo freezing since these concepts were made popular by Mazur in the late 60’s and early 70’s.  Certainly Mazur also proposed other concepts and principles of cryopreservation.  So why aren’t these other ideas mentioned?  The superficial regurgitation has led researchers down a road that has, in the past 20 years or so, yielded strikingly similar results time and time again, and has not yielded any breakthroughs that would allow for near 100% survival of embryos, not to mention unfertilized oocytes.  With no major advancements, save some of the current vitrification manuscripts, the field is at a standstill.  Protocols have been tweaked here and there for years with no substantial progress.  Usually as time goes by, the older literature becomes outdated, especially if technology is involved, and the reports of the past few years are the ones with the new advancements and the ones to focus on, but in the field of cryobiology, it is the older literature of 20-40 years ago that are the “good” reports and most current papers are the ones to be forgotten.  If no real progress has been made in 20 years, it is time to change something, anything!  By contrast, the current literature on vitrification has brought about a wide array of different protocols.  Due to the fact that we do not know much about vitrification, investigators have tried all sorts of freezing and thawing regimes, the use of numerous penetrating and non-penetrating cryoprotectants (alone or as mixtures), and various containers (cryo loops, microscope grids, pulled straws, etc.) to store oocytes or embryos.  This has led to new discoveries and new information.  What we need now is an influx of new ideas and a review of past methods in order to standardize egg and embryo storage. 

I have been working for over 8 years in the field of cryobiology and have made several interesting observations and alterations to protocols that have allowed for nearly full recovery of frozen human oocytes.  However, subsequent development of these eggs has yet to be perfected.  Most of these studies have focused on replacing sodium with choline in the freezing medium.  To date over 10 babies have been born worldwide using a choline-based medium to freeze oocytes.  We are currently in the process of several clinical trials for human oocyte, embryo, and blastocyst cryopreservation.  Stay tuned for more information regarding these trials. 

 

For more information regarding cryopreservation or specifically human oocyte cryopreservation see the special upcoming issue of Reproductive BioMedicine Online (RBMO).  Due out late 2003 or early 2004.  And stay tuned to the Galileo website for monthly updates in the field of cryopreservation.

 

 

 


HOME | ABOUT US | RESEARCH | CONSULTING | MEMBERSHIP | LINKS | CONTACT US